RUJA: Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica

 

E ectiveness of Percutaneous Electrolysis in Supraspinatus Tendinopathy: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Huget, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorGóngora-Rodríguez, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Huguet, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorIbáñez-Vera, Alfonso Javier
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Almagro, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Valero, Rocío
dc.contributor.authorDíaz-Fernández, Ángeles
dc.contributor.authorLomas-Vega, Rafael
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-20T14:48:14Z
dc.date.available2025-01-20T14:48:14Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-12
dc.description.abstractSupraspinatus tendinopathy is one of the most common causes of shoulder pain. Many studies support conservative treatments such as exercise, trigger point dry needling or corticosteroid injections. Otherwise, a minimally invasive approach with percutaneous electrolysis (PE) has also been used successfully in shoulder pain, although evidence about its long-term effects is scarce. The aim of this trial was to determine the effects of PE on supraspinatus tendinopathy compared with trigger point dry needling (TDN). Thirty-six patients with supraspinatus tendinopathy were randomly assigned to either a PE group (n = 18) or a TDN group (n = 18). Both groups also performed eccentric exercises. The main outcome to be measured was the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), but the shoulder range of motion (ROM) and trigger point pressure pain threshold (PPT) were also considered. A one-year follow-up was conducted. Significant differences favoring the PE group were found regarding pain at one-year follow-up (p = 0.002). The improvement achieved in the PE group was greater in the NPRS (p < 0.001), proximal PPT, middle PPT, distal PPT (all p < 0.001) and ranges of movement. PE seems to be more effective than TDN in relieving pain and improving ROM and PPT supraspinatus values in patients with supraspinatus tendinopathy, both right after treatment and at one-year follow-up.es_ES
dc.identifier.citationRodríguez-Huguet M, Góngora-Rodríguez J, Rodríguez-Huguet P, Ibañez-Vera AJ, Rodríguez-Almagro D, Martín-Valero R, Díaz-Fernández Á, Lomas-Vega R. Effectiveness of Percutaneous Electrolysis in Supraspinatus Tendinopathy: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 12;9(6):1837.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2077-0383es_ES
dc.identifier.otherdoi: 10.3390/jcm9061837es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10953/4214
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Medicine [2020];9(6):1837es_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectpercutaneous electrolysis; shoulder pain; supraspinatus tendinopathy; trigger point dry needling.es_ES
dc.titleE ectiveness of Percutaneous Electrolysis in Supraspinatus Tendinopathy: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Triales_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Rodríguez-Huguet. Supraspinatus 2020.pdf
Tamaño:
1.67 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.98 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:

Colecciones