RUJA: Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica

 

Comparison of the performance of two handheld XRF instruments in the study of Roman tesserae from Cástulo (Linares, Spain)

dc.contributor.authorCosta, Mafalda
dc.contributor.authorRousaki, Anastasia
dc.contributor.authorLycke, Sylvia
dc.contributor.authorSaelens, Delphine
dc.contributor.authorTack, Pieter
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Vizcaino, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorTuñón, José
dc.contributor.authorCeprián, Bautista
dc.contributor.authorAmate, Pilar
dc.contributor.authorMontejo, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorMirão, José
dc.contributor.authorVandenabeele, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-07T07:18:12Z
dc.date.available2025-01-07T07:18:12Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-11
dc.description.abstractCultural Heritage objects are frequently unavailable for transportation to laboratory facilities due to their size, location or local Cultural Heritage preservation regulations. The development of handheld XRF (hXRF) systems has, therefore, proven to be essential in the study of unmovable objects. In this study, two handheld XRF instruments—Bruker™ Tracer III SD® and Olympus™ Innov-X Delta Premium—were compared and evaluated using tesserae from the Mosaico de los Amores (Linares, Spain). Given their portability, the user-friendly nature of their operating systems and their overall performance, both hXRF instruments are highly recommended for in situ campaigns in Cultural Heritage studies. However, the detection limits calculated for each element point towards a better detection of low-Z elements when using the two-beam mode of the Olympus™ Innov-X Delta Premium hXRF. This study underlines the importance of systems that allow the analysis of the same point with analytical conditions optimized for different chemical elements.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipProject Cástulo, Investigación arqueométrica y transferencia social (HAR2016-74917-R) and by the project UID/Multi/04449/2017 (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007649).es_ES
dc.identifier.citationCosta, M., Rousaki, A., Lycke, S. et al. Comparison of the performance of two handheld XRF instruments in the study of Roman tesserae from Cástulo (Linares, Spain). Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135, 647 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00635-xes_ES
dc.identifier.issn2190-5444es_ES
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00635-xes_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10953/3712
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringer Naturees_ES
dc.relation.ispartofThe European Physical Journal Plus 2020; 135: 1-18es_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectCastuloes_ES
dc.subjectRomanes_ES
dc.subjectMosaices_ES
dc.subjectTesseraees_ES
dc.subjecthXRFes_ES
dc.titleComparison of the performance of two handheld XRF instruments in the study of Roman tesserae from Cástulo (Linares, Spain)es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersiones_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
s13360-020-00635-x.pdf
Tamaño:
2.9 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Articulo principal

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.98 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:

Colecciones