RUJA: Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica

 

Validation fo an Eye-Foot coordination Assessment Tool for Children in Dual - Task Condition

dc.contributor.authorAndrade-Lara, Karina Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorSerrano-Huete, Victor
dc.contributor.authorAtero, Eva
dc.contributor.authorPárraga, Juan Antonio
dc.contributor.authorHerrador-Sánchez, Julio
dc.contributor.authorMoreno-Marín, Asensio
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Redondo, Melchor
dc.contributor.authorManjón, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorSalas-Sánchez, Jesús
dc.contributor.authorLucena-Zurita, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorCabrera-Linares, José Carlos
dc.contributor.authorLatorre-Román, Pedro Ángel
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-17T09:30:05Z
dc.date.available2025-01-17T09:30:05Z
dc.date.issued2024-12-31
dc.description.abstractEye–foot coordination is essential in sports and daily life, enabling the synchronization of vision and movement for tasks like ball control or crossing obstacles. This study aimed to examine both the validity and reliability of an innovative eye–foot coordination (EFC) test in a dual-task paradigm in children aged 6–11 years and the capacity of this test to discriminate between sex and age. Methods: A total of 440 schoolchildren aged 6–11 years participated in this cross-sectional study. A ball control test, involving kicking and catching, was used to assess EFC. The assessment included three conditions: without interference (WI), with auditory interference (AI), and with visual interference (VI). Results: The ICCs per the EFC test scores were 0.975 for foot successes (95% CI = 0.961–0.983; p < 0.001) and 0.747 for foot mistakes (95% CI = 0.611–0.835; p < 0.001). The SEM for the standing successes was 3.082 (10.81%), and the MDC was 4.860 (17.05%). For the standing mistakes, the SEM was 1.551 (19.33%) and the MDC was 3.452 (43.04%). Moreover, boys had a significantly higher number of successes in the WI, AI, and VI conditions (p < 0.001, respectively) than girls, although girls had more mistakes than boys only in the VI condition (p = 0.025). Conclusions: The EFC test showed adequate reliability and validity. Also, the EFC test showed that performance worsened with interference regardless of sex and age, especially in girls in the VI condition.es_ES
dc.identifier.citationAndrade-Lara, K. E., Serrano Huete, V., Atero Mata, E., Párraga Montilla, J. A., Herrador Sánchez, J., Moreno Marín, A., ... & Latorre Román, P. Á. (2024). Validation of an Eye–Foot Coordination Assessment Tool for Children in Dual-Task Condition. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(1), 172.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2077-0383es_ES
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010172es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/14/1/172es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10953/4041
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Medicinees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectDual paradigmes_ES
dc.subjectMotor competence
dc.subjectCoordination test
dc.subjectInterference
dc.subjectMotor task
dc.titleValidation fo an Eye-Foot coordination Assessment Tool for Children in Dual - Task Conditiones_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
EYE Foot Coordination.pdf
Tamaño:
1.68 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.98 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: