RUJA: Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica

 

Indoor PM2.5 removal efficiency of two different non-thermal plasma systems

dc.contributor.authorHernández Díaz, David
dc.contributor.authorMartos Ferreira, David
dc.contributor.authorHernández Abad, Vicente
dc.contributor.authorVillar Ribera, Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorTarrés, Quim
dc.contributor.authorRojas Sola, José Ignacio
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-21T12:37:16Z
dc.date.available2023-12-21T12:37:16Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-15
dc.description.abstractThe use of non-thermal plasma (NTP) generators in air processing systems and their duct networks to improve indoor air quality (IAQ) has grown considerably in recent years. This paper reviews the advantages and disadvantages of NTP generators for IAQ improvement in biological, chemical and particulate pollutant terms. Also, it assesses and compares the ability of a multipin corona discharge (MPCD) and a dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) generator to reduce the concentration of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in recycled, unfiltered air in a refrigeration chamber. The MPCD generator was found to have a higher PM2.5 removal efficiency; also, it was faster in removing pollutants, used less energy, and produced much less ozone. The fact that the MPCD generator performed better was seemingly the result of its increased ion production mainly. NTP generators, however, cannot match air filtration media purifiers in this respect as the latter are much more effective in removing particles. Besides, NTP-based air purifying technology continues to be subject to a major drawback, namely: the formation of ozone as a by-product. In any case, the ozone generation was uncorrelated to ion emission when using different technologies.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment of Engineering Graphics and Design of the Polytechnic University of Catalonia.es_ES
dc.identifier.citationHernández-Díaz, D.; Martos-Ferreira, D.; Hernández-Abad, V.; Villar-Ribera, R.; Tarrés, Q.; Rojas-Sola, JI. Indoor PM2.5 removal efficiency of two different Non-Thermal Plasma systems. J. Environ. Manage. 2021; 278(Part 1): 111515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111515es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0301-4797es_ES
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111515es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301479720314407es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10953/1361
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherAcademic Press LTD - Elsevier Science LTDes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Environmental Managementes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectNon-thermal plasma (NTP)es_ES
dc.subjectCorona dischargees_ES
dc.subjectDielectric barrier discharge (DBD)es_ES
dc.subjectFine particulate matter (PM2.5)es_ES
dc.subjectOzone (O3)es_ES
dc.subjectIndoor air quality (IAQ)es_ES
dc.titleIndoor PM2.5 removal efficiency of two different non-thermal plasma systemses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersiones_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
JEMA-D-20-05770R1 - versión aceptada.pdf
Tamaño:
885.29 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.98 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:

Colecciones