DI-Comunicaciones a Congresos, Conferencias...
URI permanente para esta colecciónhttps://hdl.handle.net/10953/220
Examinar
Examinando DI-Comunicaciones a Congresos, Conferencias... por Materia "Group Recommender Systems"
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
- Resultados por página
- Opciones de ordenación
Ítem With Friends Like These, Who Needs Explanations? Evaluating User Understanding of Group Recommendations(ACM, 2025-06) Waterschoot, Cedric; Yera, Raciel; Tintarev, Nava; Barile, FrancescoGroup Recommender Systems (GRS) employing social choice-based aggregation strategies have previously been explored in terms of perceived consensus, fairness, and satisfaction. At the same time, the impact of textual explanations has been examined, but the results suggest a low effectiveness of these explanations. However, user understanding remains fairly unexplored, even if it can contribute positively to transparent GRS. This is particularly interesting to study in more complex or potentially unfair scenarios when user preferences diverge, such as in a minority scenario (where group members have similar preferences, except for a single member in a minority position). In this paper, we analyzed the impact of different types of explanations on user understanding of group recommendations. We present a randomized controlled trial (𝑛 = 271) using two between-subject factors: (i) the aggregation strategy (additive, least misery, and approval voting), and (ii) the modality of explanation (no explanation, textual explanation, or multimodal explanation). We measured both subjective (self-perceived by the user) and objective understanding (performance on model simulation, counterfactuals and error detection). In line with recent findings on explanations for machine learning models, our results indicate that more detailed explanations, whether textual or multimodal, did not increase subjective or objective understanding. However, we did find a significant effect of aggregation strategies on both subjective and objective understanding. These results imply that when constructing GRS, practitioners need to consider that the choice of aggregation strategy can influence the understanding of users. Post-hoc analysis also suggests that there is value in analyzing performance on different tasks, rather than through a single aggregated metric of understanding.