Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10953/3243
Title: Alternative Calibration of Cup Anemometers: A Way to Reduce the Uncertainty of Wind Power Density Estimation
Authors: Guerrero-Villar, Francisca
Dorado-Vicente, Rubén
Medina-Sánchez, Gustavo
Torres-Jiménez, Eloísa
Abstract: This study presents a procedure to reduce the uncertainty of wind power density estimations, which is useful to improve the energy production predictions of wind farms. Power density is usually determined from the wind speed measured by a cup anemometer and the air density value (conventional procedure). An alternative procedure based on wind speed and dynamic pressure estimations provided by a cup anemometer is proposed. The dynamic pressure is obtained by means of a calibration curve that relates the anemometer rotation frequency and the dynamic pressure measured by a Pitot tube. The quadratic regression, used to define the calibration curve, and its uncertainty are both detailed. A comparison between the alternative procedure and the conventional one points out the advantage of the proposed alternative since results show a high reduction of the indirect measurement uncertainty of wind power density.
Keywords: wind speed sensor
cup anemometer
quadratic regression uncertainty
wind dynamic pressure
wind power density
wind tunnel
anemometer calibration
pitot tube
Issue Date: 30-Apr-2019
Publisher: MDPI
Citation: Guerrero-Villar, F.; Dorado-Vicente, R.; Medina-Sánchez, G.; Torres-Jiménez, E. Alternative Calibration of Cup Anemometers: A Way to Reduce the Uncertainty of Wind Power Density Estimation. Sensors 2019, 19, 2029. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19092029
Appears in Collections:DIMM-Artículos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
sensors-19-02029.pdfGuerrero-Villar, F.; Dorado-Vicente, R.; Medina-Sánchez, G.; Torres-Jiménez, E. Alternative Calibration of Cup Anemometers: A Way to Reduce the Uncertainty of Wind Power Density Estimation. Sensors 2019, 19, 2029. https://doi.org/10.3390/s190920293,82 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright