Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10953/2059
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSavastano, M.-
dc.contributor.authorBazzicalupi, C.-
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Gallarín, C.-
dc.contributor.authorGiorgi, C.-
dc.contributor.authorLópez de la Torre, M.D.-
dc.contributor.authorPichierri, F.-
dc.contributor.authorBianchi, A.-
dc.contributor.authorMelguizo, M.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-05T08:40:33Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-05T08:40:33Z-
dc.date.issued2018-01-24-
dc.identifier.citationDalton Trans; 2018: 47, [3329]es_ES
dc.identifier.other10.1039/C7DT04430Ees_ES
dc.identifier.uriThe formation of halide and hydroxide anion complexes with two ligands L1 (3,6-bis(morpholin-4- ylmethyl)-1,2,4,5-tetrazine) and L2 (3,6-bis(morpholin-4-ylethyl)-1,2,4,5-tetrazine) was studied in aqueous solution, by means of potentiometric and ITC procedures. In the solid state, HF2 −, Cl− and Br− complexes of H2L22+ were analysed by single crystal XRD measurements. Further information on the latter was obtained with the use of density functional theory (DFT) calculations in combination with the polarizable continuum model (PCM). The presence of two halide or bifluoride HF2 − (F–H–F−) anions forming anion–π interactions, respectively above and below the ligand tetrazine ring, is the leitmotiv of the [(H2L2)X2] (X = HF2, Cl, Br, I) complexes in the solid state, while hydrogen bonding between the anions and protonated morpholine ligand groups contributes to strengthen the anion–ligand interaction, in particular in the case of Cl− and Br−. In contrast to the solid state, only the anion : ligand complexes of 1 : 1 stoichiometry were found in solution. The stability of these complexes displays the peculiar trend I− > F− > Br− > Cl− which was rationalized in terms of electrostatic, hydrogen bond, anion–π interactions and solvent effects. DFT calculations performed on [(H2L2)X]+ (X = F, Cl, Br, I) in PCM water suggested that the ligand assumes a U-shaped conformation to form one anion–π and two salt bridge interactions with the included anions and furnished structural information to interpret the solvation effects affecting complex formation. The formation of hydroxide anion complexes with neutral (not protonated) L1 and L2 molecules represents an unprecedented case in water. The stability of the [L(OH)]− (L = L1, L2) complexes is comparable to or higher than the stability of halide complexes with protonated ligand molecules, their formation being promoted by largely favourable enthalpic contributions that prevail over unfavourable entropic changes.es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10953/2059-
dc.description.abstractThe formation of halide and hydroxide anion complexes with two ligands L1 (3,6-bis(morpholin-4- ylmethyl)-1,2,4,5-tetrazine) and L2 (3,6-bis(morpholin-4-ylethyl)-1,2,4,5-tetrazine) was studied in aqueous solution, by means of potentiometric and ITC procedures. In the solid state, HF2 −, Cl− and Br− complexes of H2L22+ were analysed by single crystal XRD measurements. Further information on the latter was obtained with the use of density functional theory (DFT) calculations in combination with the polarizable continuum model (PCM). The presence of two halide or bifluoride HF2 − (F–H–F−) anions forming anion–π interactions, respectively above and below the ligand tetrazine ring, is the leitmotiv of the [(H2L2)X2] (X = HF2, Cl, Br, I) complexes in the solid state, while hydrogen bonding between the anions and protonated morpholine ligand groups contributes to strengthen the anion–ligand interaction, in particular in the case of Cl− and Br−. In contrast to the solid state, only the anion : ligand complexes of 1 : 1 stoichiometry were found in solution. The stability of these complexes displays the peculiar trend I− > F− > Br− > Cl− which was rationalized in terms of electrostatic, hydrogen bond, anion–π interactions and solvent effects. DFT calculations performed on [(H2L2)X]+ (X = F, Cl, Br, I) in PCM water suggested that the ligand assumes a U-shaped conformation to form one anion–π and two salt bridge interactions with the included anions and furnished structural information to interpret the solvation effects affecting complex formation. The formation of hydroxide anion complexes with neutral (not protonated) L1 and L2 molecules represents an unprecedented case in water. The stability of the [L(OH)]− (L = L1, L2) complexes is comparable to or higher than the stability of halide complexes with protonated ligand molecules, their formation being promoted by largely favourable enthalpic contributions that prevail over unfavourable entropic changes.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipFinancial support from the Italian MIUR (project 2015MP34H3) and from the Spanish MINECO (project MAT2014-60104-C2-2-R) is gratefully acknowledged. The centre of instrumental facilities, STI, of the University of Jaén is acknowledged for technical assistance. FP acknowledges the Department of Applied Chemistry of the Graduate School of Engineering of Tohoku University for financial support.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherRoyal Society of Chemistryes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofDalton Transactionses_ES
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.subjectTetrazineses_ES
dc.titleHalide and hydroxide anion binding in wateres_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersiones_ES
Appears in Collections:DQIO-Artículos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
18_DT_47_3329.pdf1,42 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright