Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10953/1374
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMoreno-Albarracín, Antonio Luis-
dc.contributor.authorLicerán-Gutiérrez, Ana-
dc.contributor.authorOrtega-Rodríguez, Cristina-
dc.contributor.authorLabella, Álvaro-
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez, Rosa María-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-09T10:19:43Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-09T10:19:43Z-
dc.date.issued2020-09-04-
dc.identifier.citationMoreno-Albarracín, A. L., Licerán-Gutierrez, A., Ortega-Rodríguez, C., Labella, Á., & Rodríguez, R. M. (2020). Measuring what is not seen—Transparency and good governance nonprofit indicators to overcome the limitations of accounting models. Sustainability, 12(18), 7275.es_ES
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.3390/su12187275es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10953/1374-
dc.description.abstractOne of the most complex challenges currently faced by non-profit organizations (NPOs) is demonstrating that they manage resources with the highest levels of efficiency and excellence, and do not deviate from the accomplishment of their mission. Transparency and good governance are highly valuable issues for the survival of these organizations. However, empirical studies and models to measure these concepts are scarce and lack consensus. The objective of this article is to develop a uniform procedure for measuring the levels of transparency and good governance in NPOs, validated by experts, that integrates the most important contributions. The main proposals are supported by lists of indicators whose compliance they try to verify. Finally, we considered the experts’ preferences to obtain the indicator weights by means of the Best–Worst Method and Minimum Cost Consensus model. The result of our work is the development of a list of indicators, which integrates the existing battery of Spanish indicators. We contribute, with this work, to improving the credibility of the third sector from the perspective of donors, users, public administrations, and society. This is an essential issue for the survival of these NPOs.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversidad de Jaén, Instituto de Estudios Giennenses (Diputación de Jaén), Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Gobierno de España) a través del Proyecto de Investigación Nacional del Gobierno de España PGC2018-099402-B-I00 y el Contrato Postdoctoral Ramón y Cajal (RYC-2017-21978).es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofSustainabilityes_ES
dc.subjectthird sectores_ES
dc.subjectnon-profit organizations (NPO)es_ES
dc.subjecttransparencyes_ES
dc.subjectaccountabilityes_ES
dc.subjectgood governancees_ES
dc.subjectbatteries of indicatorses_ES
dc.subjectBest-Worst Method (BWM)es_ES
dc.subjectminimum cost consensus (MCC)es_ES
dc.titleMeasuring what is not seen—Transparency and good governance nonprofit indicators to overcome the limitations of accounting modelses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
Appears in Collections:DEFC-Artículos



This item is protected by original copyright


Items in RUJA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.