RUJA: Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica

 

Optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction of biomass from olive trees using response surface methodology

dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Patiño, José Carlos
dc.contributor.authorGullón, Beatriz
dc.contributor.authorRomero, Inmaculada
dc.contributor.authorRuiz, Encarnación
dc.contributor.authorBrnčić, Mladen
dc.contributor.authorŽlabur, Jana Šic
dc.contributor.authorCastro, Eulogio
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-07T00:41:35Z
dc.date.available2024-02-07T00:41:35Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractOlive tree pruning biomass (OTP) and olive mill leaves (OML) are the main residual lignocellulosic biomasses that are generated from olive trees. They have been proposed as a source of value-added compounds and biofuels within the biorefinery concept. In this work, the optimization of an ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) process was performed to extract antioxidant compounds present in OTP and OML. The effect of the three parameters, ethanol/water ratio (20, 50, 80% of ethanol concentration), amplitude percentage (30, 50, 70%) and ultrasonication time (5, 10, 15 min), on the responses of total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC) and antioxidant activities (DPPH, ABTS and FRAP) were evaluated following a Box–Behnken experimental design. The optimal conditions obtained from the model, taking into account simultaneously the five responses, were quite similar for OTP and OML, with 70% amplitude and 15 min for both biomasses and a slight difference in the optimum concentration of ethanol. (54.5% versus 51.3% for OTP and OML, respectively). When comparing the antioxidant activities obtained with OTP and OML, higher values were obtained for OML (around 40% more than for OTP). The antioxidant activities reached experimentally under the optimized conditions were 31.6 mg of TE/g of OTP and 42.5 mg of TE/g of OML with the DPPH method, 66.5 mg of TE/g of OTP and 95.9 mg of TE/g of OML with the ABTS method, and 36.4 mg of TE/g of OTP and 49.7 mg of TE/g of OML with the FRAP method. Both OTP and OML could be a potential source of natural antioxidants.es_ES
dc.identifier.citationUltrasonics Sonochemistry 51 (2019) 487-495es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1350-4177es_ES
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.05.031es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10953/2203
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.relation.ispartofUltrasonics Sonochemistry 51 (2019) 487-495es_ES
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.subjectExtraction from biomasses_ES
dc.subjectOlive tree pruning biomasses_ES
dc.subjectOlive mill leaveses_ES
dc.subjectAntioxidant activityes_ES
dc.subjectBiorefineryes_ES
dc.titleOptimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction of biomass from olive trees using response surface methodologyes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersiones_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Optimization of ultrasound version aceptada.pdf
Tamaño:
902.24 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.98 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:

Colecciones