RUJA: Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica

 

A Systematic Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Assessment of Quality, Bias Risk, and Data Fusion

dc.contributor.authorAlbahri, Ahmed Shihab
dc.contributor.authorDuhaim, Ali M.
dc.contributor.authorFadhel, Mohammed A.
dc.contributor.authorAlnoor, Alhamzah
dc.contributor.authorBaqer, Noor S.
dc.contributor.authorAlzubaidi, Laith
dc.contributor.authorAlbahri, Osamah S.
dc.contributor.authorAlamoodi, Abdullah Hussein
dc.contributor.authorBai, Jinshuai
dc.contributor.authorSalhi, Asma
dc.contributor.authorSantamaria, José
dc.contributor.authorOuyang, Chun
dc.contributor.authorGupta, Ashish
dc.contributor.authorGu, Yuantong
dc.contributor.authorDeveci, Muhammet
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-11T07:51:41Z
dc.date.available2024-02-11T07:51:41Z
dc.date.issued2023-08-10
dc.descriptionEl trabajo forma parte de un desarrollo conjunto por parte del Dr. Laith Alzubaidi, el Dr. José Santamaria (el Dr. Santamaría realizó tareas de co-supervisión de la tesis doctoral del Dr. Alzubaidi), y otros investigadores. La aportación de los Drs. José Santamaría y Laith Alzubaidi consistió en profundizar aún más en el estudio de aspectos tales como la explicabilidad y confiabilidad de los modelos de aprendizaje vistos en la tesis doctoral del Dr. Alzubaidi con repercusión en el ámbito de la salud.es_ES
dc.description.abstractIn the last few years, the trend in health care of embracing artificial intelligence (AI) has dramatically changed the medical landscape. Medical centres have adopted AI applications to increase the accuracy of disease diagnosis and mitigate health risks. AI applications have changed rules and policies related to healthcare practice and work ethics. However, building trustworthy and explainable AI (XAI) in healthcare systems is still in its early stages. Specifically, the European Union has stated that AI must be human-centred and trustworthy, whereas in the healthcare sector, low methodological quality and high bias risk have become major concerns. This study endeavours to offer a systematic review of the trustworthiness and explainability of AI applications in healthcare, incorporating the assessment of quality, bias risk, and data fusion to supplement previous studies and provide more accurate and definitive findings. Likewise, 64 recent contributions on the trustworthiness of AI in healthcare from multiple databases (i.e., ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore) were identified using a rigorous literature search method and selection criteria. The considered papers were categorised into a coherent and systematic classification including seven categories: explainable robotics, prediction, decision support, blockchain, transparency, digital health, and review. In this paper, we have presented a systematic and comprehensive analysis of earlier studies and opened the door to potential future studies by discussing in depth the challenges, motivations, and recommendations. In this study a systematic science mapping analysis in order to reorganise and summarise the results of earlier studies to address the issues of trustworthiness and objectivity was also performed. Moreover, this work has provided decisive evidence for the trustworthiness of AI in health care by presenting eight current state-of-the-art critical analyses regarding those more relevant research gaps. In addition, to the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate the feasibility of utilising trustworthy and XAI applications in healthcare, by incorporating data fusion techniques and connecting various important pieces of information from available healthcare datasets and AI algorithms.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to acknowledge the support received through the following funding schemes of Australian Government: Australian Research Council (ARC) Industrial Transformation Training Centre (ITTC) for Joint Biomechanics under grant IC190100020. The authors also would like to acknowledge the support received through the QUT ECR SCHEME 2022 and the Centre for Data Science First Byte Scheme, The Queensland University of Technology.es_ES
dc.identifier.citationAlbahri A.S., Duhaim A.M., Fadhel M.A., Alnoor A., Baqer N.S., Alzubaidi L., Albahri O.S., Alamoodi A.H., Bai J., Salhi A., Santamaria J., Ouyang C., Gupta A., Gu Y., Deveci, M.; A Systematic Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Assessment of Quality, Bias Risk, and Data Fusion,. Information Fusion (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.03.008es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1566-2535es_ES
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.inffus.2023.03.008es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.03.008es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10953/2335
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.relation.ispartofInformation Fusion 2023; 96: 156-191es_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectTrustworthinesses_ES
dc.subjectExplainabilityes_ES
dc.subjectHealthcarees_ES
dc.titleA Systematic Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Assessment of Quality, Bias Risk, and Data Fusiones_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
1-s2.0-S1566253523000891-main.pdf
Tamaño:
13.26 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Fichero PDF

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.98 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:

Colecciones